Does Alternet's article
The End of the Internet may sound like scaremongering but to me its legitimate cause for concern and protesting in the streets. Just who's money paid for the research that created the single network protocol in use across the world now? Do you have any doubt that if it hadn't come out of publicly funded efforts and unfettered growth without explicit commercial restrictions, that there ever would have been one network protocol? No, we'd probably all be working with dozens, if not hundreds of proprietary protocols backed by a plethora of self-interested commercial entities - just like we have for instant messaging, streaming media and the like.
I think it sounds like the #1 reason why the Bells and Cable companies should be taken out of the loop via removing their last mile monopoly. Its probably precisely why they are trying so hard to stop non-commercial last mile solutions that wouldn't give a rats-a$$ about tracking and prioritizing traffic. Once you get to the backbones surely there are more than enough backbone carriers who just don't want to get into that grey area of spying on end users and are doing quite well enough shoveling bits wholesale.
I also disagree that Google and others would necessarily just cut a deal. All signs are that they are very busy plotting to do their own thing for the last mile for an end-run around the telcos wherever and whenever possible. Of course I have no delusions about Google's motives - they want to sell advertising - but I still think they are slightly less evil than the telcos and cable companies.
Finally a thought - maybe its time for the return of
UUCP with a 21st century flavor - layered over dial-up, DSL, Cable, WiFi, WCDMA, etc. whatever works, and call it Internet III. An entire renegade protocol and network layered over whatever communications network there is. Make it peer to peer (remember UUCP was effectively
the original peer-to-peer network), mesh, or whatever works to get the packets through the commercial barriers. Initially it will have limitations, it will be slower, it will face adversity but eventually it will rise about the ashes of Internet I.
Internet I was designed to survive a nuclear war, but frequently, thanks to commercialization can't even withstand a backhoe cutting a single link. Internet II was designed to be super fast but is restricted to academia. Internet III will be designed to just get the packets through - unfettered, unfiltered, unmonitored, unregulated, unstoppable.
The Internet is dead - long live the Internet!